BF2 and COD look the same to me?
(06-07-2010, 02:03 AM)Christopha Wrote: Just watched those videos, and I found the bottom to be more impressive. =/
HOW? He missed twice and it wasn't nearly as fantastic a shot as the one above. You can hardly see the guy in that one
They see me trollin', they hatin'.
Not really. COD4 had better players.
They see me trollin', they hatin'.
I have changed my decision..I like BF:BC 2 10x more than MW 2..
Why?
No fucking noob tubers everywhere, when you get a sniper kill you don't get called a camper, because well..that's how everyone plays when sniping..And..all I did was snipe on the game, and I love it..MOVE OUT OF THE WAY INTERVENTION, HERE COMES THE M24!
@PerryThePerson
Made a Twitter cause everyone bitch's on Facebook.
Twitter? U MAD
Well I like both of them and I usually playing them. But I just want to say that COD is a single player game where they added a multiplayer. But I think that the single player will be great but when that's done you won't spend many hours on the multiplayer. And BFBC is a multplayer with a single player added.
He got it right on the (red) dot!
They see me trollin', they hatin'.
Other way around there mate:
BFBC has a decent campaign with an alright multiplayer (I enjoy it because it's different)
COD on the other hand (or at least MW2) was a multiplayer from the outset, exactly the same as MW1 turned out
![[Image: Bulbasaur_by_bigsharn.jpg]](http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2010/113/9/8/Bulbasaur_by_bigsharn.jpg)
As you do...
Sharn, that is wrong. Battlefield has always been primarily multiplayer: Battlefield 1944 and 2 are prime examples
COD has always been single player with add-on. COD2's online was ghastly but the story was brilliant. It's the same all the way up the chain. All the CODs focus on solo rather than onl,ine - exception being MW2 which they fucked up
They see me trollin', they hatin'.
